I first talked about this problem on this blog on May 24, 2012. And it’s a significant part of my new book, Arrested Development. It’s not only HOW police measure, but that while doing so they are HONEST.
Now there are some new developments reported by the New York Times last month…
Read the following article:
“An anonymous survey of nearly 2,000 retired officers found that the manipulation of crime reports — downgrading crimes to lesser offenses and discouraging victims from filing complaints to make crime statistics look better — has long been part of the culture of the New York Police Department.
“The results showed that pressure on officers to artificially reduce crime rates, while simultaneously increasing summonses and the number of people stopped and often frisked on the street, has intensified in the last decade, the two criminologists who conducted the research said in interviews this week.
“’I think our survey clearly debunks the Police Department’s rotten-apple theory,’ said Eli B. Silverman, one of the criminologists, referring to arguments that very few officers manipulated crime statistics. ‘This really demonstrates a rotten barrel.’
“Dr. Silverman, professor emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, and John A. Eterno, a retired New York police captain, provided The New York Times with a nine-page summary of the survey’s preliminary results. After reviewing a copy of the summary, the Police Department impugned the findings on Wednesday. Paul J. Browne, the department’s chief spokesman, criticized the researchers’ methodology and questioned the reliability of the findings.
“’The latest report from Eterno and Silverman appears designed to bolster the authors’ repeated but unsupported claims,” Mr. Browne said. “The document provides no explanation of how the survey sample was constructed.’
“Dr. Eterno and Dr. Silverman have previously argued that the Police Department’s longstanding focus on reducing major felony crimes has given rise to ‘a numbers game.’
“Their survey is likely to rekindle the debate, which flared up earlier this year after The Village Voice detailed the case of Adrian Schoolcraft, an officer in the 81st Precinct in Brooklyn who secretly gathered evidence, including audio recordings, of crime-report manipulation. Shortly after Mr. Schoolcraft presented the evidence to police investigators, his superiors had him involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital, saying he was in the midst of a psychiatric emergency.
“The survey, conducted earlier this year, was financed by Molloy College. Dr. Eterno and Dr. Silverman e-mailed a questionnaire to 4,069 former officers who had retired since 1941. Roughly 48 percent — 1,962 retired officers of all ranks — responded…”
AND SO IT GOES… The stats get juked to make the bosses look good!
Who suffers? Citizens who are deceived and police officers who are forced to go along with what they know is wrong.
To read the entire article click here.